The 3 - September 8, 2019

This week's edition of The 3 offers a solution to the problematic "Drag Queen Story" events at local libraries, based on what one Texas town did.  Also, a NFL quarterback endorsed an initiative from a Christian organization encouraging young people to bring Bibles to school, and felt compelled to issue a response to his critics for doing so.  And, the politics of abortion will continue to be a big issue in the 2020 Presidential race, and in the past week, two candidates made sweeping statements about a so-called woman's right to terminate the life of her unborn baby.

Texas city stands against Drag Queen Story Time event

The wave of Drag Queen Story hours, in which men dressed as women read stories to children, mainly at local libraries, children who have been brought by their parents, who are seemingly not offended by what has been called a "grooming" exercise for liberalized and dangerous views on sexuality, according to a Christian Post article.

The article reports that counselor Jon Uhler says "he believes Drag Queen Story Hour events constitute 'the greatest grooming program ever devised' and predators 'are laughing all the way to the bank.'"

The Post also says:

But Uhler does not believe marching and picketing Drag Queen Story Hour events is effective because by the time they are scheduled it's almost always too late. Instead, parents should go to the events and tape what goes on with their phones or hidden cameras and then expose it.

"The only way this is going to be stopped is if the public sees that every single time, at every single one of these, really perverse things are going on. So you let their own actions speak for themselves," Uhler said.

In Texas, a City Council has taken a bold step to try to put a halt to these events.  According to
The Daily Signal:

The City Council of Leander, Texas, 22 miles northwest of Austin, voted 5-2 at its Aug. 15 meeting to stop renting out meeting rooms at the library to the public.

“We brought in $1,800 in rental fees and we spent $20,000 in security,” Leander Mayor Troy Hill said, apparently referring to the drag queen event. “That’s not good math to me.”

Elizabeth Castle, a policy adviser for Texas Values, is quoted in the article. She says: "I’ve done some research and … their day job, without going further into, you know, anything personal, if you just Google them you can find out that they work at adult nightclubs," adding, “And so those people shouldn’t be reading to children.” Castle also stated, “These drag queens are told to read stories, you know, about gender transitioning and about sexual orientation to young kids as young as infant age...," and that, the city "wants to protect their children, and for the most part they seem to be against the ‘Drag Queen Story Hours.’”

NFL quarterback encourages students to take Bible to school, receives criticism

A high-profile NFL quarterback, arguably one of the best to play the professional game, endorsing students taking their Bibles to school, has received an unwarranted amount of criticism for this recommendation.  Bring Your Bible to School Day is an initiative of Focus on the Family.  Its President, Jim Daly, wrote:

New Orleans Saints quarterback Drew Brees was forced to respond to criticism late yesterday for recording a 22-second video promoting our organization’s annual “Bring Your Bible to School Day”, which occurs this coming October 3rd.

Specifically, Brees was put on the defensive for doing the video because Bring Your Bible to School Day is associated with Focus on the Family. Critics were aghast that he would lend his name to the event, citing our ministry’s belief in biblical marriage and support of counseling for those with unwanted same-sex attraction.

Daly added:

In reporting on the episode, the Washington Post pejoratively labeled us as an “anti-LGBT religious group.”

Is there no longer any realm where I can disagree with someone on the definition of marriage and human sexuality and still be considered a decent person?

By both the Post’s and other critic’s standards, anybody who holds to the historical teachings of biblical sexuality is now labeled a bully and bigot, someone who holds others in personal contempt.

Daly also said that, "Like Scripture teaches and Drew Brees referenced, we believe we’re called to love God with all our heart and with all our soul and with all our mind. We’re also commanded to love our neighbors, whether they identify as heterosexual, homosexual or something else." He related that, "Tolerance is a two-way street."  

Daly also said that:

Drew Brees is the latest individual to be caught up in the middle of a growing intolerance toward those of us with a conservative Christian worldview. Whether it’s Second Lady Karen Pence being attacked for teaching art at a Christian school, the New York Times asking for stories about “#exposechristianschools,” public high school students in Pennsylvania battling a “Bible ban” on their campus, or Chick-fil-A being banned from airports due to their biblical beliefs, people of conservative Christian faith are being unfairly targeted.

This latest turn reminds us why it’s vital to empower the next generation with the understanding that they don’t have to hide their faith or compartmentalize it to the “private” sphere.

Democratic candidates offer strong support for abortion up until birth

It is obvious that the 2020 crop of Democrat party candidates have traveled quite a distance from the mantra of "safe, legal, and rare" regarding abortion.  Now, within the past week, you have had one candidate emphasize abortion as a means of population control and another saying that life does not begin until a baby is outside the womb, and attempted to twist Scripture to do it.

Take for instance, one of the frontrunners in the race, Bernie Sanders.  The Susan B. Anthony List, referring to a Daily Wire article, took Sanders to task.  The senator said, in response to a question on reducing a growth in population, that women in the U.S.: "...have a right to control their own bodies and make reproductive decisions."  He added...

"And the Mexico City agreement — which denies American aid to those organizations around the world that allow women to have abortions or even get involved in birth control — to me is totally absurd," Sanders continued. "So I think, especially in poor countries around the world where women do not necessarily want to have large numbers of babies and where they can have the opportunity through birth control to control the number of kids they have, it's something I very strongly support."

SBA List President Marjorie Dannenfelser stated, "This takes Democratic abortion extremism to a new low. Every Democratic candidate for president should immediately be asked where they stand on eugenic population control, especially frontrunner Joe Biden in light of his past comments condoning the Chinese government’s oppressive One-Child policy..."

Abortion as population control is the position of Bernie Sanders. South Bend, IN, mayor Pete Buttegieg should have no problem with that, and he seems resolute in lecturing Christians about what they should believe.  The Susan B. Anthony List highlighted the mayor's recent comments on The Breakfast Club show, referencing a Daily Caller article, which stated:

Buttigieg discussed how the Bible talks about life beginning with breath, and suggested this would be one way to determine when life began in relation to abortion debates.

He said, "...there’s a lot of parts of the Bible that talk about how life begins with breath, and so even that is something that we can interpret differently.”

Buttigieg added, "I think, no matter what you think about the kind of cosmic question of how life begins, most Americans can get on board with the idea of, alright, I might draw the line here, you might draw the line there, but the most important thing is the person who should be drawing the line is the woman making the decision..."

Again, from SBA List's Dannenfelser, just a day after strong comments about Sanders: "Just when it seemed that the Democrats’ extremism had hit rock bottom, Pete Buttigieg has taken the party to a new low in justifying abortion on demand and even infanticide through the moment a child takes her first breath. Buttigieg should be ashamed of his inhumane remarks..."  About both men, the pro-life leader expressed her view that both are too extreme to be President.

The 3 - September 1, 2019

In this week's edition of The 3, offering three stories of relevance to the Christian community, there is news of a court victory by filmmakers who want to get into the wedding industry, but are concerned about a state law that would force them to make videos of same-sex weddings.  Also, the Trump Administration is standing with a nurse who was forced to participate in an abortion despite her religious objections.  And, a Bible translator and his wife are the victims of an attack in the African nation of Cameroon; he died and his wife lost an arm.

Christian wedding videographers win court challenge in MN

Carl and Angel Larsen are filmmakers based in St. Cloud, MN; they want to enter the wedding industry, but there is a problem: a non-discrimination law passed by the state that could force them to make wedding videos that violate their deeply held beliefs, i.e., they would be forced to produce videos of same-sex wedding ceremonies, according to the Alliance Defending Freedom website,

The Larsens filed what is known as a "pre-enforcement challenge" lawsuit against the law.  The ADF website states:

After the district court ruled in favor of Minnesota’s motion to dismiss the Larsens’ lawsuit, ADF attorneys appealed to the 8th Circuit, which received several friend-of-the-court briefs, including one filed by 10 states, supporting the artistic freedom of the Minnesota filmmakers. The Larsens are challenging portions of Minnesota Statutes Chapter 363A on the grounds that the public accommodation law illegally controls artistic expression—violating their freedom to choose which messages they will express, and refrain from expressing, through their films.

The 8th Circuit ruled in favor of the Larsens on appeal, and, according to ADF, "reinstated the free speech and free exercise of religion claims of the lawsuit...The court also ordered the district court to consider whether the Larsens are entitled to a preliminary injunction barring enforcement of the law against them. According to the site, the court stated, "...Because the First Amendment allows the Larsens to choose when to speak and what to say, we reverse the dismissal of two of their claims and remand with instructions to consider whether they are entitled to a preliminary injunction….”

On this Friday's edition of The Meeting House, Jake Warner, Legal Counsel for ADF, will discuss the particulars and implications of this case.

Pro-life nurse claims VT hospital forced her to participate in abortion

The University of Vermont Medical Center receives Federal funding, therefore, it is subject to Federal law, including the Church Amendment, which, according to a FoxNews.com story, which is intended to prevent health care professionals from having to participate in abortion, an activity that would violate their deeply held beliefs.

The Fox website states that: "The Trump administration is pursuing action against the University of Vermont Medical Center (UVMC), which receives federal funds, after a nurse says her supervisors forced her to participate in an abortion against her will."  According to Jordan Sekulow of the American Center for Law and Justice, Sekulow stated that, "The Trump administration, President Trump, and Secretary Azar at HHS, is the first administration to actually enforce it against these hospitals, to actually enforce conscience protections so that nurses and doctors and medical professionals aren't forced to perform abortions against their religious or deeply held beliefs..."  He said the Church Amendment was passed in 1973.

ACLJ represents a nurse who "filed a conscience and religious discrimination complaint against UVMC" last year, claiming the hospital broke the law. The hospital is doubling down, claiming its "robust, formal protections that safeguard both our employees' religious, ethical and cultural beliefs, and our patients' rights to access safe and legal abortion."  The medical center's trustee board chair is a former Planned Parenthood regional CEO, and the hospital began to perform elective abortions in 2017 when that individual assumed that position.

Bible translator attacked, killed; wife injured in Cameroon incident

In Africa, the nation of Cameroon borders Nigeria to the east.  There have been reports of attacks on Christians by members of the Fulani militants in Nigeria, and a recent incident in Cameroon is quite disturbing. Mission Network News reports that:

...a Bible translator participating in the Wycliffe Bible Translators movement was killed in his home during an attack by the Fulani herdsmen. The attack took place in Wum, a village located in the Northwest of the country.

The attackers used a machete to dismember Angus Abraham Fung. The Christian Post reports Fung’s wife, Eveline, had her arm cut off. However, she and another person who was staying in their home did manage to escape. Per the report, Eveline is currently receiving a blood transfusion.

Wum is in a region where you have people who are attempting to gain independence, an area consisting of English-speaking residents.

According to Efi Tembon of Oasis Network for Community Transformation, quoted in the MNN article, “One of the big issues there is that the government, with a more international pressure getting [put on the] Cameron government, they have been trying to provoke a religious war to just create chaos. Create division between the local people..." The piece goes on to say:

Tembon believes the Christian community is an easy target for these attacks. There are also suspicions that individuals within the Cameroon government are utilizing the Fulani herdsmen for attacks on locals, particularly those fighting for independence or associated with the movement.

The 3 - August 25, 2019

This week's edition of The 3, highlighting three stories of relevance to the Christian community, includes Christian persecution developments in two countries - in China, where a pastor has been released from prison, and in Mexico, where a pastor was shot and killed after a church service.  Plus, Planned Parenthood has announced it will withdraw from a Federal program which would not allow it to refer for abortion, if it wished to receive taxpayer funds.

Chinese pastor released, other church members, including senior pastor, facing continued imprisonment

Last December, around 100 members of the Early Rain Covenant Church in Sichuan, China were arrested.  One of the pastors of the church, Li Yingqiang, according to Faithwire, was recently released - he had been charged with “stirring up trouble and “running an illegal business.”

The article did point out that:

The church’s lead pastor, Wang Yi, remains incarcerated. Yi openly has openly criticized President Xi Jinping, even preaching a sermon openly calling him to repent of his sins.

Early Rain Covenant Church is not on the required registry of state-sanctioned churches and is thus deemed illegal by authorities. Millions of Christians risk their lives to meet in these so-called “underground” places of worship on a weekly basis.

More recently, Early Rain issued a statement which claimed that authorities are trying to suppress Pastor Yi’s legal team in a bid to keep him locked up.

Pastor Li, just prior to be arrested, according to the article, had said, according to Asia News: “Persecution is a price worth paying for the Lord. We would rather live through it than to hide our faith and we hope more Chinese churches will speak up and stand with us.”

Mexican pastor shot to death after church service

The Christian Post has a disturbing account of the persecution of Christians in Mexico; recently, according to the story:

According to international watchdog group Christian Solidarity Worldwide, Pastor Alfrery Líctor Cruz Canseco was sitting in his car outside Fraternidad Cristiana church in the town of Tlalixtac de Cabrera in Oaxaca state when he was shot at point-blank range.

Cruz Canseco died while he was being transported to a local hospital.

CSW offers some insight into the climate surrounding Protestant, as well as Catholic, groups in Mexico.  The Post states: "CSW warns that the expansion of criminal groups in Mexico as well as a 'climate of impunity' when it comes to crimes they commit has led to an increase in violence against Protestant and Catholic leaders because they are viewed as a threat to criminal groups." CSW reports, according to the story, that "10 religious leaders were killed in Mexico in 2018."

Planned Parenthood refuses to participate in government rule

There is a major development regarding the Trump Administration's "Protect Life Rule," which provides federal funds for health care facilities under what is called Title X, but those facilities cannot refer for abortion.  Planned Parenthood, which attempts to portray itself as a champion of women's health care but is the nation's largest abortion provider, has told the Administration, "no thanks."

Christian Headlines reports that since the 9th Circuit did not strike down the rule, Planned Parenthood has withdrawn from the program, walking away from $60 million that would have come its way - if it simply would not refer for abortion. The article says, "Planned Parenthood...called it 'an unethical and dangerous gag rule' that 'forced' the organization out of Title X."

The story stated that Title X "provides low-income people with cancer screenings, pregnancy tests and contraceptives." The Department of Health and Human Services noted that "the statute written by Congress prohibits funding programs where abortion is a method of family planning.” And, as Christian Headlines adds:

HHS also pushed back against Planned Parenthood’s claim that HHS was harming low-income people. HHS said there are 4,000 Title X service sites across the nation, with Planned Parenthood “representing fewer than 400.”

The 3 - August 18, 2019

This week's edition of The 3 features two stories related to action in Federal district courts: one involves a ruling involving bathroom usage in favor of a former high school student who is female, but identifies as a male.  Another deals with inequities of funding of campus organizations at a California college.  Plus, the Administration has announced a new policy on protecting religious freedom of contractors who do business with the Federal government.

Appeals Court rules in favor of transgender female in bathroom flap

Gavin Grimm is a female; she identifies as male, and wanted to use the boy's restroom at her school.  The school district said "no," and Grimm filed a lawsuit - in 2015.  According to
The Christian Post, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled in favor of Grimm because of "a 2015 Obama administration guidance encouraging all public schools to allow transgender students to use facilities consistent with their gender identity."

But, in 2017, as the article points out, "The Obama-era bathroom guidance was rescinded under the Trump administration..."  The U.S. Supreme Court sent the case back to the lower appeals court, and it was relayed to the district level.

So, the case went back up the chain, and recently, a Federal district judge ruled in favor of the now-graduated Grimm.  The article says:

Judge Arenda Wright Allen, an appointee of President Barack Obama, contended in her court order that the school district violated the 14th Amendment and Title IX of education civil rights law by not allowing the biologically female student into boys' bathrooms and by refusing to change school transcripts to reflect the student's gender identity.

This is clearly another attempt to redefine sex, according to the Title IX civil rights provisions, to mean "sexual orientation" or "gender identity," granting special consideration to those identify as a gender other than their biological one.

Department of Labor announces religious freedom protections

A new rule from the Trump administration protects the religious freedom rights of Federal contractors, according to Liberty Counsel, which states on its website that, "The proposed rule by the U.S. Department of Labor’s Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs ensures that conscience and religious freedom are given the broadest protection permitted by law."

According to Liberty Counsel, "The proposal also reaffirms employers’ obligations not to discriminate on the basis of race, sex, or other protected bases and does not exempt or excuse a contractor from complying with any other requirements."

Mat Staver, Founder and Chairman of Liberty Counsel, responded by saying, "I commend the Trump administration and the Department of Labor for not discriminating against religious employers and organizations that can provide the same high-quality services as allowed by other federal contractors..."  

California university directed to address discrepancy on funding for student groups

California State University-San Marcos funds a variety of the 100 student groups on campus through mandatory student fees.  The Alliance Defending Freedom reports on its website that during the 2016-17 school years that the Gender Equity Center and the LGBQTA Pride Center received almost $300,000 for "speech and expressive activities." That's just over one-fifth of the fees that had been received. The other groups: a combined total of just over $38,000.

That same school year, "Students for Life applied for a $500 'Leadership Funding' grant to host pro-life speaker and University of North Carolina–Wilmington Professor Mike Adams to provide an alternative view" to the clear promotion of a homosexual agenda. It was denied, and Students for Life filed a lawsuit.

Recently, the university's policy was struck down by a Federal district court, referring to the school's activities as "back room deliberations."  ADF Senior Counsel Caleb Dalton stated: 

“The university spared no expense to fund the advocacy of its preferred student groups but denied funding for speakers from Students for Life. But yesterday, the district court correctly declared, ‘These “back room deliberations” are exactly the [sic] type of considerations the First Amendment is designed to prevent. Nothing prevents these officials from encouraging some views while suppressing others through cosponsorship funding.’ We’re grateful the district court has rejected this unfair and discriminatory policy as unconstitutional.”

The 3 - August 11, 2019

This week's edition of The 3, features another three stories of relevance to the Christian community, including topic areas of pro-life, transgender pronouns, and the censorship of Christian content - step 3, the restorations.  Stories include the Kentucky governors signing of 4 pro-life bills, a student's right to free speech concerning transgender pronouns upheld, and a channel restored to the large tech firm's news app.

Not 1, not 2, but 4 pro-life bills signed by KY governor

Governor Matt Bevin of Kentucky has developed a reputation as a Christian, pro-life, pro-family leader who is devoted to religious freedom.  This past week, he signed multiple pro-life bills into law in his state, according to the 14 News website.  The article lists the four new laws:

• Senate Bill 9 is known as the heartbeat bill. It bans abortion after detection of a fetal heartbeat.
• Senate Bill 50 requires doctors present information to patients about the reversal of medication abortions.
• House Bill 5 bans abortions based on sex, race, or perceived disability.
• House Bill 148 states if Roe v. Wade is overturned abortions will be banned in Kentucky.

The governor is quoted as saying: “People of western Kentucky are very strongly and appropriately on the side of life," adding, "Meant a lot to me to be out here to celebrate with these bill sponsors and the people who sent them to Frankfort.” He signed the bills in Owensboro at the Daviess County Courthouse.  He also shared a broad view about the importance of support for pro-life legislation: "This issue, frankly, isn’t about faith...It’s about science. It’s about medicine. It’s about morality. It’s about who among us even remotely can think we can justify the taking of an innocent life when we know for a fact that’s exactly what it is.”

School corrects punishment for student in pronoun flap

Another of the troublesome aspects of the furtherance of the transgender agenda has to do with the use of pronouns, instances that have been seen in a variety of settings, including schools, where students wish to be called by the pronoun corresponding to the gender they identify as, rather than their biological gender.

Liberty Counsel reports on the situation involving a student in an Ohio school in which a sixth-grader was "punished by an assistant principal in an Ohio school district for using the male pronoun 'he' in reference to a male student..." (That student was apparently identifying as female.)  The student was also reportedly punished "for respectfully stating his opinion that 'he is a boy, not a girl...'" in a discussion with other students. The student was told that he would be facing "consequences" and was not allowed to participate in PE that day.

The report states:

After Liberty Counsel intervened, the school district claimed the PE class removal was not “formal disciplinary action” and said no record of it exists, but conceded that neither Liberty Counsel’s student client nor others would be subject to discipline for expressing “respectful disagreement on any topic,” nor for using accurate “pronouns in referring to students,” and that teachers would not “coerce any student to use a particular pronoun.” “John’s” parents were satisfied with this result.

Liberty Counsel Founder and President Mat Staver said that, "Schools cannot force students to lie about objective reality..."

Another correction: Christian conservative website back on Apple News

It seems like an almost weekly occurrence when you have Christian content or content consistent with a Christian perspective blocked by large tech firms. Sometimes, there is a reversal.

Last week, the channel of LifeSite was removed from Apple News after having originally been selected to be posted.  Apple has reversed its course.  The LifeSiteNews.com website reported, "the Apple News team informed LifeSite that they have 're-evaluated' our channel. LifeSite's channel and articles are once again available on the Apple News app."

The article published on Tuesday, August 6, stated:

Since last week, over 57,000 people have signed a petition demanding that Apple re-enable LifeSite's channel. Approximately 1000 of those signatories also opted to send a physical postcard to Apple's heardquarters, demanding LifeSite's channel be re-instated.

And, when you go to the LifeSite web site, you will see a listing of "Must-Reads," including a story originally published on Newsbusters, that highlight's YouTube's banning of a conversative teenager named Soph.  The article said that BlazeTV host Lauren Chen had featured a clip from...

...Soph's video "Pride and Prejudice" which got her banned. In the video she commented on the nature of LGBT politics: "When you attack the concept of gay pride for what they're doing to children" the left will respond by attacking the critic as someone who hates all gay people, she explained. "It's morality laundering, they put the indefensible together with the legitimate so that you can't scrutinize it without being called a homophobe."

The 3 - August 4, 2019

In this week's edition of The 3, highlighting three stories of relevance to the Christian community, there are more instances of Christian websites that are facing opposition: one in the face of removal from a platform, another facing criticism.  Also, evangelicals in Bolivia are beginning to feel empowered by recent government activity.  And, after a long ordeal, a California professor who was removed due to his views on same-sex attraction has won a court victory.

Christian sites face opposition

While sites such as Facebook continue to allow inflammatory rhetoric to be distributed on its site, the website continues to go after people like Todd Starnes or Elizabeth Johnston, who post beliefs that are consistent with their Christian worldview.

And, Facebook is not alone...just recently, LifeSiteNews, after reaching an agreement with Apple News to place content on its site, Apple News then decided to remove LifeSite, which states:

A little over one week ago, Apple approved LifeSiteNews’ application to publish our news on their Apple News platform.

Today, without warning, Apple News abruptly reversed course, telling LifeSite that they had deleted our channel and all of our content from their platform.

The story continues:

Apple claimed that LifeSite’s channel “didn't comply with our Apple News guidelines.” Specifically, they stated that LifeSite’s “[c]hannel content shows intolerance towards a specific group.”

But, Apple News did not identify the "specific group" toward which LifeSite was being intolerant. LifeSiteNews Editor-in-Chief John-Henry Westen said, “...at a time when there is growing evidence that tech juggernauts are engaging in concerted censorship against even mainstream conservative viewpoints, Apple’s decision – made unilaterally, and without opportunity to appeal – is frightening.”

And, for some reason, the fact-checking website known as Snopes has an obsession, seemingly, with the Christian satire site, the Babylon Bee.  Recently, according to Newsbusters, the Bee satirized the recent skirmish at a Publix grocery store in the Atlanta area, in which a state representative initially alleged that another customer told her to go back where she came from, an accusation that he denied.  Newsbusters reports that the Bee:

...inserted the eternally gracious staff at Chick-fil-A into the scene for laughs: “Georgia Lawmaker Claims Chick-Fil-A Employee Told Her To Go Back To Her Country, Later Clarifies He Actually Said ‘My Pleasure.’”

Snopes launched its attack, complaining "We're not sure if fanning the flames of controversy and muddying the details of a news story classify an article as 'satire.'"

The article points out that "Ellie Gardey at the Daily Caller forced Snopes to revise their 'fact check' and add actual facts," which included the representative's attempt to revise her story.  Babylon Bee founder Adam Ford was offended; the Newbusters article stated:

The shameless clickbait-specialists of Snopes slammed the Bee for "an apparent attempt to maximize the online indignation." This spurred a long Twitter thread by Babylon Bee founder Adam Ford. He was offended: "What a subjective and malicious statement! This is a 'fact check'?"

Ford also disliked this claim: "The Babylon Bee has managed to fool readers with its brand of satire in the past." Snopes said "dozens" of idiots on social media believe these satirical posts are real. Ford replied "Doesn't that wording really make it sound as though the Bee is TRYING to fool readers? Like we INTEND to, and sometimes succeed?"

Bolivian evangelicals flex muscle

The South American nation of Bolivia had become a secular nation back in 2009, but the Protestants there believed that they did not receive the proper recognition, according to ReligionNews.com, which reports that, "Protestant denominations have spent the past decade mobilizing their growing numbers of followers, finally forcing a religious freedom law that codifies their tax status and, perhaps more importantly, giving them standing in Bolivian society."

Munir Chiquie, president of the National Association of Evangelicals of Bolivia, also referred to as ANDEB, is quoted as saying, “For the first time, the religious entities have a legal identity, with the rights to self-determination and independence from the State..."

The law came in the aftermath of the government's attempt to enact a new penal code, Article 88, which was "aimed at combating terrorism and trafficking," but "Christians charged that Article 88’s language was so expansive and vaguely written that it could result in the persecution of clergy for evangelizing."  Just two months after its implementation, President Evo Morales "moved to have it revoked."  Christians and government officials began to talk with each other, and this year, a new religious freedom law was signed that, according to the article, "imposes regulations on religious organizations, including a requirement to report their activities to the government annually, but in return no taxes are levied on them. And the very fact of being monitored gives them a legitimacy in the eyes of the government that Protestant churches have never enjoyed."  Protestants now make up 17% of the country's population, up from just over 7-1/2 percent in 1985.

But not all are happy in the religious community. According to the article, in the general election in October, "Morales is being opposed in his pursuit of a fourth term by Víctor Hugo Cárdenas, whose running mate, Humberto Peinado, is pastor of the Church of the Christian Family in Santa Cruz. Both men have criticized the religious freedom law."

California professor wins court victory

Recently, a professor who had been lauded twice over his career at Moreno Valley College in California as "Faculty of the Year," recognized by students, has won a court victory after being removed from his position because of his views on same-sex attraction.

Pacific Justice Institute reported on the case involving Professor Eric Thompson:

In 2014, several students and colleagues complained that Thompson was harming students by exposing them to the view that same-sex attraction might stem from environmental factors rather than a person’s biology. The community college subsequently investigated Thompson three times and, although the investigations concluded that no violation of District Policy or Administrative Procedure occurred, labeled Thompson’s actions “unprofessional.” After multiple hearings, the college put Thompson on paid leave in 2016 and fired him in 2017 for conducting “dangerous” and “immoral” discussions.

A PJI attorney represented Thompson in an arbitration period, which resulted in the termination being reversed and a judge upheld that decision in the face of the school district's petition to overturn the arbitrator's decision.

The 3 - July 28, 2019

This week's edition of The 3, with three stories of relevance to the Christian community, involves two stories out of South Carolina - one with a rather happy ending involving a memorial to police officers that contained the name, "Lord," and another that is related to graduation speech, specifically religious content.  And, the U.S. House passed a resolution recently, by a wide margin, that shows support to Israel.

Flap over police memorial in SC city: city officials restore monument and the name, "Lord"

A statement from the South Carolina city said it well: "This was a tough week in Tega Cay." That is from a Fox Carolina report.  That "tough week" was the result of a series of unforced errors by the city in response to a Fallen Officer’s Memorial, which was situated outside the city’s police department.

Inscribed on the monument was the Police Officers' Prayer, and according to Fox Carolina, the city had "initially painted over the word 'Lord,' which appeared in several places on the monument, because city leaders were fearful of a lawsuit after a resident complained."

Then, a statement released to The Herald by the city on Thursday stated: “At this time, we have removed the monument while we continue to seek a solution that expresses our unwavering support and gratitude to those who risk their lives every day for ours...We will continue to welcome feedback from our residents and seek further guidance from our legal team until we can find a viable solution for all concerned.”

All of this came about as the result of this, as the Herald reported: "A Tega Cay resident protested at the July 15 city council meeting."

The city released a statement on Friday, saying, according to Fox Carolina:

After careful consideration and much conversation with people on both sides of the discussion, City Council has made the decision that the Police Officer's Prayer will be restored to its original condition and returned to the Fallen Officers’ Memorial located at the new police station. We want to thank everyone for voicing your opinion, as it’s not always easy to do so on such a sensitive subject.

SC school district forces graduation prayer restrictions

More news out of South Carolina this week, where a judge has placed restrictions on graduation speech in the Greenville school district, according to the Greenville News website.  The site says:

Graduation ceremonies at Greenville County Schools will no longer be allowed to include official student-led prayer or language that asks the audience to stand or bow after the U.S. District Court of South Carolina ruled in favor of a humanist group in a longstanding lawsuit.

The judge in the case, U.S. District Judge Bruce Hendricks, said, according to the newspaper, that, "Schools will not be allowed to play religious music and students cannot submit prayers for review by school officials prior to the event, as has been done in recent years, but students who choose to pray during time allotted for student remarks may still do so provided it’s done without the knowledge or guidance of school officials, without asking the audience to participate and without pre-planning as part of the program."

The lawsuit was brought by the American Humanist Association. Beth Brotherton of Greenville County Schools said, "We are pleased that the Court has upheld the fundamental issue of the case and supported our position that students selected to speak at graduations based upon religiously neutral criteria have the right to share their personal stories, even if those include a religious message,” adding, “We are also pleased that the Court refused to grant AHA’s request to prevent all remotely religious messaging or prayer at School District events.” But, AHA was doing a victory lap, with spokesperson Monica Miller saying, "We are thrilled that the court is finally putting an end to flagrant school-sponsored prayers and Christian hymns at public school graduation ceremonies..."

U.S. House overwhelmingly votes for pro-Israel, anti-BDS resolution

The U.S. House of Representatives demonstrated support for Israel in a resolution that passed last week by a large margin, according to ChristianHeadlines.com, which described the resolution as "calling Israel a 'key ally' and criticizing a prominent movement to boycott the Jewish state."

The bill passed 398-17; 16 opposing votes came from Democrats, including Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Ilhan Omar, and Rashida Tlaib, three of the four members of  the "Squad;" the other member, Ayanna Pressley, voted in favor of the resolution.

The article states...

...the pro-Israel resolution that passed the House explicitly criticizes the BDS movement. That resolution calls Israel a “democratic, Jewish State” that is a “key ally and strategic partner of the United States.”

“The Global Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions Movement (BDS Movement) targeting Israel is a campaign that does not favor a two-state solution and that seeks to exclude the State of Israel and the Israeli people from the economic, cultural, and academic life of the rest of the world,” the pro-Israel resolution says. “... [T]he BDS Movement does not recognize, and many of its supporters explicitly deny, the right of the Jewish people to national self-determination.”

Meanwhile,  according to Christian Headlines, Rep. Omar had announced her own resolution, “affirming that all Americans have the right to participate in boycotts in pursuit of civil and human rights.” The story says that, "Omar’s resolution doesn’t mention Israel, but she told reporters it was the intended target. The resolution does, however, mention boycotts of Nazi Germany and South African apartheid as positive examples from U.S. history." According to The Hill, Pressley is a co-sponsor of that resolution.

The 3 - July 21, 2019

This week's edition of The 3, with three stories of relevance to the Christian community, there is news that has emerged from a special conference this week on religious freedom, the formation of a new alliance from a variety of nations to address that topic.  Also, school children in a British city will no longer be allowed to congregate at a public library, due to their inclusion of Christian songs in a group meeting.  And, the chaplain of the U.S. House offered a prayer this week incorporating elements of spiritual warfare following a tumultuous week.

Secretary of State announces International Religious Freedom Alliance

This past week, the U.S. State Department sponsored its second Ministerial to Advance Religious Freedom. ReligionNews.com reported on the events, stating that there were "two days of meetings where survivors shared their stories of persecution and some of the almost 900 religious leaders and activists in attendance made plans to foster interfaith understanding."

The article also said:

Before a gathering of representatives of 106 countries, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo announced plans to create the International Religious Freedom Alliance.

During the event that spanned three days, according to the article, "speakers hailed religious freedom victories that had occurred since the first ministerial a year ago. That included the release of Pastor Andrew Brunson, an American evangelical detained in Turkey for two years." Brunson prayed at a Thursday luncheon for "heads of delegations," and said, "I bless you in the name of my king, Jesus Christ."

About this new alliance, Pompeo said, “We hope that this new vehicle — the first-ever international body devoted to this specific topic – will build on efforts to date and bring like-minded countries together to confront challenges of international religious freedom,” adding, “It will provide a space for the work that we do here to flourish throughout the year.”

Other speakers included Vice-President Mike Pence, who declared, “The United States stands with all victims of religious persecution and the American people have them in our hearts — and in our prayers...”

British library bans church group from assembling

In Great Britain, a children's group that has been prevented from meeting at the public library, as it has done for the past eight years.

According to ChristianHeadlines.com:

The volunteers at Noah's Ark playgroup says it had been meeting at the Burgess Hill Library in the British county of West Sussex for eight years – they had never encountered any issues until now.

Despite the group serving the local community for free, library officials demanded that they move elsewhere after some parents complained that they were unhappy with the Christian message contained within the songs.

The article quoted from the Mid Sussex Times, which had reported on a statement from a "spokesperson from the West Sussex County Council," who said: “Rhyme time sessions are held every week in all West Sussex libraries and are open to everyone including families of any faith or no faith. In Burgess Hill, a partnership was formed with a local faith group some years ago before rhyme time sessions were offered across all libraries.”

The Christian Headlines piece said that, "Many of the regular attendees were absolutely outraged at the decision to cancel the group." A spokesperson for The King’s Church Mid-Sussex said that the church was “sad that our involvement in Baby Rhyme Time is coming to an end after eight years," but that "we respect the decision of West Sussex Library services and we will continue to do all that we can to serve them and our local community.”

Meanwhile, Liberty Counsel reported on the recent American Library Association annual conference, attended by some 21,000 people, stating that it "provided librarians from across the country with strategies for bringing LGBT propaganda, pornography, and “drag queen story times” for children into primarily taxpayer-funded public libraries while avoiding parents’ knowledge. The report says that the ALA "also provides librarians 'crisis communication plans' to 'shield themselves' from events or materials they provide using public resources that generate a public backlash, such as the 'drag queen story hours.'"

U.S. House chaplain prays against "spirits of darkness"

It was certainly a contentious week in the U.S. House of Representatives, as lawmakers passed a resolution denouncing the President for his criticism of 4 members of the House, and an attempt to impeach Mr. Trump was turned back.  No doubt, those events contributed to the content of a prayer by U.S. House Chaplain Patrick Conroy as he opened up the session on Thursday.

FoxNews.com reports that Conroy started out by declaring, “This has been a difficult and contentious week in which darker spirits seem to have been at play in the people’s House..." The story continues:

Then, in a dramatic moment, Conroy raised both hands and said, "In Your most holy name, I cast out all spirits of darkness from this chamber. Spirits not from You. I cast out the spirit of discouragement which deadens the hope of those who are of goodwill...

The Chaplain closed with these words:

May your spirit of wisdom and patience descend upon all so that any spirit of darkness might have no place in our midst. Rather, let Your spirit of comity, of brother-and-sisterhood, and love of our nation, and all colleagues in this chamber, empower our better angels to be at play in the common work to be done, for the benefit of all Your people. May all that is done within the people's House be for Your greater honor and glory. Amen."

This can be a reminder to pray for public officials and to recognize that there is a spiritual dimension to the work that they do. 

The 3 - July 14, 2019

In this week's edition of The 3, with three stories of relevance to the Christian community, there is news out of Oklahoma, where a ban on a particular abortion procedure has been upheld by a judge. Also, Veterans' Administration facilities will have new rules on religious displays, thanks to a new policy announced by the VA secretary.  And, over a hundred churches in Egypt have been officially legalized there, bringing the total to over a thousand since a new law was enacted in 2016.

OK ban on abortion procedure OK'ed by Federal judge 

In 2015, the state of Oklahoma passed a new law called the Oklahoma Unborn Child Protection from Dismemberment Abortion Act. This bill was intended to ban dilation and extraction abortions, described in a story at The Washington Times as a common but controversial procedure typically used in pregnancies after 14 weeks.

The Center for Reproductive Rights, filed the lawsuit on behalf of the Tulsa Women’s Clinic and just last week, Oklahoma County District Judge Cindy Truong allowed the law to stand. The article said that the procedure is "typically used in pregnancies after 14 weeks." In a statement, Attorney General Mike Hunter stated, “Dismemberment abortions are barbaric, brutal and subject unborn children to more cruelty that we allow for death row inmates,” adding, “It is unconscionable to think that we would allow this practice to continue.”

The law now goes into effect, but it is unsure how long - the Oklahoma Supreme Court, as the Times states, "has blocked various anti-abortion measures in the past few years, including in April when it blocked a law that restricted access to drug-induced abortions in a 7-1 decision."

New Bible distribution rules put in place at VA hospitals

The Department of Veterans Affairs has announced new regulations regarding religious expression in the aftermath of the Peace Cross ruling in June from the U.S. Supreme Court.  A Christianity Today article said that, "The VA said the case 'reaffirmed the important role religion plays in the lives of many Americans and its consistency with Constitutional principles.'"

The article states:

The revised policies “allow the inclusion in appropriate circumstances of religious content in publicly accessible displays at VA facilities.”

They also permit patients to request and be provided with sacred texts, symbols and religious literature during treatment at facilities or visits to VA chapels. And they allow the VA “to accept donations of religious literature, cards and symbols at its facilities and distribute them to VA patrons under appropriate circumstances or to a patron who requests them.”

VA Secretary Robert Wilkie said, "We want to make sure that all of our Veterans and their families feel welcome at VA, no matter their religious beliefs. Protecting religious liberty is a key part of how we accomplish that goal." Mike Berry of First Liberty, which had contacted Wilkie about allowing Bibles to be part of POW/MIA remembrance displays, said, "This new VA policy is a welcome breath of fresh air...The Supreme Court recently upheld the constitutionality of religious displays with historic roots such as those commonly found in VA facilities. We commend the VA for taking this necessary and positive action.”

Over a hundred churches recognized as legal in Egypt

In 2016 in Egypt, a law had passed that promised that churches in the nation would have a smoother process to be approved by the government, and now that law may be starting to bear fruit, based on a a CBN.com story, which says that, "Since the law passed, some 1,021 have been granted permits by the committee, according to International Christian Concern."

That includes the "legalization of 127 churches which were previously being run in an illegal capacity."  The article also says:

While the committee still has many churches to legalize, this is a promising start for a country in which Coptic Christians have faced fierce levels of violence and persecution for decades.

According to Persecution watchdog Open Doors USA, the country's Christians still face daily persecution from groups within the Islamic-majority population, as well as mistreatment from the government itself.

The Islamic culture "fuels discrimination and creates an environment causing the state to be reluctant to respect and enforce the fundamental rights of Christians," Open Doors explains on its Egypt fact page.

The CBN article notes that prior to the passage of that 2016 law, "it was notoriously difficult to approve state approval and, therefore, congregations could find themselves at risk of prosecution."  Perhaps there is now some measure of relief.

The 3 - July 7, 2019

This week's edition of The 3 includes the action of a denomination in removing a church and its pastor which had embraced homosexuality, in opposition to church teaching.  Also, the Blandensburg "Peace Cross" case has resulted in the U.S. Supreme Court sending a Pensacola case involving a veterans' memorial in the shape of a cross back to a lower court.  And, a British student has received positive court action in the U.K. after being removed from school due to social media content opposing homosexuality.

Evangelical Covenant Church removes MN church and pastor relative to same-sex marriage beliefs

It seems as if denomination after denomination is dealing, to some degree, with the issue of homosexuality.  It's not just the so-called "mainline" denominations, either.  Recently, Southern Baptists and the Presbyterian Church in America, in their annual gatherings, passed statements regarding the topic.

And, now, you have this dramatic move from the Evangelical Covenant Church, which, according to ReligionNews.com, recently "voted to remove a congregation from its roster over its position on LGBTQ inclusion." This was the first such occurrence in the 134 years the denomination has been in existence. The story states:

The vote to expel the First Covenant Church, a prominent and historic Minneapolis congregation, for being “out of harmony on human sexuality,” took place at the denomination’s annual meeting in Omaha on Friday (June 27).

The Minneapolis church has never performed a gay marriage, though a lesbian couple had an off-site wedding performed by its music director in 2014, which produced a series of conversations about its future over the past few years.

The denomination also expelled from its roster the Rev. Dan Collison, the church’s pastor.

The actions come after First Covenant said it would treat LGBTQ members as equals, allow married gay clergy and would be open to hosting same-sex marriages.

According to the article, the denomination's position is "that heterosexual marriage, faithfulness within marriage and abstinence outside of marriage constitute the Christian standard."

U.S. Supreme Court sends Pensacola cross case back to appeals court to reconsider

Now that the U.S. Supreme Court has upheld the constitutionality of a large veterans' memorial in Maryland in the shape of a cross, there will no doubt be implications for religious displays all across the country.

Case in point: a memorial in a Pensacola park that was ordered to be removed by the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.  As Liberty Counsel reports on its website, the high court...

...ordered a lower court to reconsider its earlier ruling that a World War II-era memorial cross in Pensacola must be removed. In Kondrat’yev v. City of Pensacola, a federal appeals court had ruled that the 78-year-old cross must come down, with two of the three judges saying that the outcome was “wrong” but that their “hands were tied” because of the so-called “Lemon Test.”

Referring to the Maryland decision, the website states:

In its 7-2 decision last week, the High Court made it clear that the so-called “Lemon Test” was not useful for cases involving ceremonial, celebratory or commemorative monuments that include religious imagery. Instead, the justices adopted a “strong presumption of constitutionality” for longstanding monuments. The ruling recognized that “a government that roams the land, tearing down monuments with religious symbolism and scrubbing away any reference to the divine will strike many as aggressively hostile to religion” which the Constitution does not require. The Supreme Court said that although “the Cross is undoubtedly a Christian symbol. . . the Cross does not offend the Constitution.”

British student expelled for views against homosexuality wins court victory

Felix Ngole was a student in Great Britain at the University of Sheffield until 2016, when he posted opinions opposing same-sex marriage on Facebook.  An article at the ChristianHeadlines.com website traces the timeline:

In 2017, after mounting a legal battle against his dismissal and arguing that his human rights had been violated, the UK’s High Court ruled in favor of the University.

Now, in a momentous decision, the Court of Appeals has overturned the previous ruling and slapped down the university for its discriminatory action, urging them to reconsider Ngole’s case.

What did Felix do that was so egregious? According to the article: "Ngole shared Bible verses which supported the traditional view that marriage is God-ordained and should be exclusively between one man and one woman. He also asserted that 'the Bible and God identify homosexuality as a sin,' according to the BBC.

In the story, "Christian Concern, the UK-based advocacy group helping Ngole with his case," is quoted, saying,“The mere expression of religious views about sin does not necessarily connote discrimination..."  The Christian Concern website states, "the Court of Appeal held that it was the university that was ‘lacking insight’ in not understanding a Christian viewpoint."  The site also says:

The Court ruled that: “The mere expression of views on theological grounds (e.g. that 'homosexuality is a sin') does not necessarily connote that the person expressing such views will discriminate on such grounds.” It was further recognised that Felix had never been shown to act in a discriminatory fashion.

The outcome of this case will have significant implications not only for Christian freedom of speech, but in relation to all free speech. For example, comments made by people on social media (often many years ago) have recently been arbitrarily used to silence viewpoints that people dislike or disagree with.

The 3 - June 30, 2019

This week's edition of The 3 includes more madness from California, where politicians are attempting to tell church leaders what to do regarding homosexuality.  Also, a Federal appeals court has ruled that a Trump Administration policy barring undocumented teens receiving abortions is unconstitutional.  And, a Spokane pastor's attempt to observe a Drag Queen Story Hour has resulted in his arrest.

California lawmakers pass resolution calling on church leaders to reject Scripture on LGBTQ

The continued advancement of the LGBTQ agenda is quite apparent in the state of California, where the state Assembly attempted to assert its will over community leaders, including church leaders.
WORLD Magazine reports that:

The California State Assembly passed a resolution on Monday calling on religious leaders and others with “moral influence” to affirm homosexuality and transgenderism. The resolution asks counselors, pastors, churches, educators, schools, legislators, and others to avoid supporting traditional and Biblical views of sexuality, which the measure claims can cause suicide and depression.

Over 25 Christian leaders, according to WORLD, "signed a letter condemning the resolution, which they said violates religious freedom." One phrase they wrote stated that: “...politicians have no right to tell clergy what is moral, dictate the content of their sermons, or instruct them in religious counseling.”

One chaplain from a Christian university, however, took the other side, according to California Family Council, whose president, Jonathan Keller, signed the letter.   However, Peter Mannoia of Asuza Pacific University and former head of the National Association of Evangelicals, wrote a letter of support and testified before a committee.  The Council's site stated:

During Mannoia’s testimony in favor of ACR 99, before the judiciary committee, he reiterated his relationship with Jesus Christ as “my friend and guide” and his commitment to live “under the authority of God’s word.” But again Mannoia didn’t explain how he could believe this while supporting a resolution condemning Christian efforts to help those with unwanted same-sex attraction or gender confusion.

Appeals court allows for abortions for undocumented teenagers

The immigration issue and the issue of abortion have met together, and a Federal court has ruled in favor of abortion for undocumented teenagers.  TheHill.com reports that "The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals...ruled against the Trump administration’s policy of blocking undocumented pregnant teenagers in federal custody from obtaining abortions."

The judges stated that they “are unanimous in rejecting the government’s position that its denial of abortion access can be squared with Supreme Court precedent.”  The three-judge panel ruled 2-1 against the Administration.  They stated that the ruling applies to teens in "federal custody," and that those undocumented teenagers who are 18 years of age and up can obtain abortions.

The judges rejected the Administration argument, according to the article, "that the teenagers could have sought to be deported voluntarily in order to obtain an abortion, and that an unaccompanied pregnant minor could be released to a sponsor and then have the procedure."

Pastor arrested during Drag Queen Story Hour in Spokane

These inexplicably popular Drag Queen Story Hours are popping up in cities all across America, and in Spokane, a public library had an increased police presence, complete with snipers, according to ToddStarnes.com, referring to a report in the Spokesman Review.

Onto the scene walked a Baptist preacher, Afshin Yaghtin, who is pastor of New Covenant Baptist Church in Spokane.

Starnes relates that:

Several hundred critics of the drag queen event were protesting outside — frustrated that the taxpayer funded library was being used to indoctrinated [sic] small children.

Pacific Justice Institute says the pastor tried to enter the library to observe the event but was barred by police.

Brad Dacus of PJI stated, “He did not carry signs or preach and he did not consider himself to be a protester..." Yet, after he, as Starnes put it, "asserted his First Amendment rights," he was arrested and taken to jail.

While the protesters were separated, supporters were allowed to stay on public property, according to Dacus, who said: "This arrest in Spokane is one of the clearest examples yet of viewpoint discrimination, and we will be vigorously contesting the charges,” adding, “We must be able to peacefully disagree and voice our concerns in public places without fear of arrest and prosecution based on viewpoint.”

The 3 - June 23, 2019

This week on The 3, identifying three news stories of relevance to the Christian community, two cases involving religious freedom received positive rulings from the U.S. Supreme Court: a large veterans' memorial in the shape of a cross was ruled to be constitutional, and a state court ruling against two Oregon bakers was overturned and sent back to the state court system.  Plus, a classic Christian worship song has been sung frequently in recent protests in Hong Kong.

Peace Cross can stand, U.S. Supreme Court rules

Earlier this year, the U.S. Supreme Court held oral arguments in a case involving a large veterans' memorial in Bladensburg, Maryland that is in the shape of a cross.  A lower court, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, had ruled the display unconstitutional, according to First Liberty, representing the American Legion in the case.

The appeal went before the court, and First Liberty's website states:

...in a 7-2 decision, the Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States preserved the nearly 100-year old Bladensburg WWI Veterans Memorial, along with memorials like it bearing religious symbols across the country. Most importantly, in The American Legion v. American Humanist Association, the Justices reaffirmed that the First Amendment allows people to use religious symbols and images in public.

Kelly Shackelford, President, CEO, and Chief Counsel to First Liberty, is quoted as saying, "This is a landmark victory for religious freedom. The days of illegitimately weaponizing the Establishment Clause and attacking religious symbols in public are over..." The website says, "...the Court returned to a commonsense reading of the Establishment Clause that guards against the establishment of an official religion, while permitting the public acknowledgment of religion in public."

Worship song makes impact in Hong Kong protests

If you are familiar with some of the Maranatha! Music worship songs, then Sing Hallelujah to the Lord may be a song that you have heard or perhaps even sung.  Now, it has become an anthem for protesters in Hong Kong, who have taken to the streets in opposition that would make it easier to extradite charged criminals to mainland China.

FoxNews.com reported on the presence of the song, stating in an article in the past week:

For the past week, "Sing Hallelujah to the Lord" has been heard almost non-stop at the main protest site in front of the city's Legislative Council, and at marches and tense stand-offs with police, Reuters reported.

Although only 10 percent of the population is Christian, church groups quickly rallied after being alarmed by reports of police brutality to make a safe haven for protesters as the government said it had to crack down on "organized riots."

The article stated, "Hong Kong's Beijing-backed government leader, Carrie Lam, who is Catholic herself, apologized in face of the opposition, postponing the introduction of the extradition bill. Some protesters hoped the Christian anthem would help sway her."  As Fox points out, "Critics say the extradition bill would undermine Hong Kong's independent judiciary and rule of law, guaranteed by a "one country, two systems," formula under the former British colony returned to Chinese rule in 1997."

Oregon bakers get reprieve from U.S. Supreme Court

It was a week of doubly positive news for First Liberty, which was involved in the Bladensburg cross case and has been representing Oregon bakers Aaron and Melissa Klein, who had declined to provide a cake for a same-sex wedding ceremony and eventually were find $135,000.  The Oregon Court of Appeals had ruled against the couple, and the decision was appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court.

According to the First Liberty website...

...the Supreme Court of the United States announced that it reversed a decision the state of Oregon that forced bakers Aaron and Melissa Klein out of business by penalizing them $135,000 for refusing to create a government-approved message. The case was sent back to the Oregon courts for further review in light of its Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission.

The site said that in the Masterpiece case, "the Justices reminded government officials that they cannot be hostile to the free exercise of the religious beliefs of its citizens."

The 3 - June 16, 2019

On this week's edition of The 3, with three stories of relevance impacting the Christian community, a major pro-life organization has been removed from a large social media site.  Also, several states have passed new abortion laws that liberalize the practice.  And, an important Texas religious freedom bill is now law.

Pro-life organization removed from Pinterest

The organization Live Action, founded by Lila Rose, has a following of over 3.3 million in social media, and according to the Live Action website, its content has now been removed from the photo-sharing website Pinterest.

The site says that a video from "an undercover investigation conducted by Project Veritas, a watchdog group founded and run by James O’Keefe...features an anonymous whistleblower who is an employee of Pinterest, claiming to have discovered inside communications confirming that a top official at Pinterest intentionally added LiveAction.org to the blocked list of pornography websites in February of 2019."

The site relates that the "whistleblower," identified as Eric Cochran, has been fired.

This past Tuesday, according to Live Action, "Pinterest suddenly and inexplicably permanently suspended Live Action’s account, saying the account 'may have immediate and detrimental effects on a Pinner’s health or on public safety.'"

Rose stated:

What exactly is Pinterest attempting to block? Inspirational messages to pregnant mothers, ultrasound images showing the science of prenatal development, medically accurate information on the abortion procedure, and images saying women deserve better than abortion industry leader Planned Parenthood. Pinterest has targeted Live Action, I believe because our message is so effective at educating millions about the humanity of the preborn child and the injustice of abortion. Pinterest says that their mission is to “help empower people to discover things that they love,” but despite the fact that millions of people love babies and the pro-life cause, they are secretly censoring our life-affirming messages.

There is an online petition available at LiveAction.org.

More states approve extreme abortion bills

For several months after the outrageous actions of the New York state legislature and governor to legalize abortion during all nine months of pregnancy, state after state began to pass stronger pro-life legislation, including a number of "heartbeat" bills, as well as the criminalization of abortion in Alabama.

Now, unfortunately, the pendulum has been swinging in the opposite direction.  The Susan B. Anthony List website reports that the Governor of Illinois, J.B. Pritzker, has signed a bill that not only allows abortion at any time of pregnancy, but repeals previously passed legislation, such as a ban on partial birth abortion.  The website indicates that the law will: eliminate any licensing requirements for abortion clinics and conscience protections for people in the health care field, and establish a "legal framework to abolish Illinois’ parental notification law."

SBA List also reports that Maine's Governor, Janet Mills, has "signed legislation into law that expands taxpayer funding of abortion in MaineCare and forces private insurers to pay for abortions, at an estimated cost to taxpayers of more than $1.3 million through FY 2023. Earlier this week Mills signed legislation to allow physician assistants and other non-doctors to perform abortions."

Also, LifeNews.com reports that Vermont's Republican Governor, Phil Scott, has signed a bill legalizing abortion during the entirety of pregnancy there. Mary Hahn Beerworth, executive director of Vermont Right to Life, stated, "By putting his signature on H. 57, Governor Phil Scott endorses unlimited, unregulated abortion throughout all nine months of pregnancy,” adding, “His signature signals his preference for protecting the business of abortion over other life-affirming options in Vermont statute.”  The article says:

State House Bill 57 recognizes abortion as a “fundamental human right” and ensure that the government does not deny, restrict or infringe upon a woman’s “right” to abort her unborn baby. It also removes protections for pregnant victims of violence and medical malpractice.

Important Texas religious freedom bill now law

An important religious freedom bill out of Texas has been signed into law by Governor Greg Abbott.
ChristianHeadlines.com reported that the bill, "will protect businesses from being discriminated against by government entities because of their 'membership in, affiliation with, or contribution, donation, or other support provided to a religious organization.'"

The bill was introduced and passed after San Antonio's City Council twice voted against allowing Chick-fil-A to open in the city's international airport, due to its association with religious organizations and the religious beliefs of its CEO, described erroneously as "anti-LGBTQ." The state Attorney General and the federal Department of Transportation are reportedly looking into the legality of these actions.

In the article, Hiram Sasser, General Counsel for First Liberty, is quoted as saying: "The city's decision to ban Chick-fil-A was blatant, illegal religious discrimination. We want to know just how deep the religious animosity runs within San Antonio's city government..."

The article also stated:

State Rep. Matt Schaefer (R-TX) voiced that the bill was necessary to protect people of faith. "Should any city council be able to refuse me as a vendor in their city simply because I make donations to my church, which holds a biblical view of marriage?" he questioned.

The 3 - June 9, 2019

In this week's edition of The 3, featuring three stories of relevance to the Christian community, there is a promising development regarding research on tissue from embryos who have been aborted.  And, the Washington Supreme Court, has ruled against a florist there for a second time as a result of her declining to provide flowers for a same-sex wedding ceremony.  And, one Virginia pastor prayed for the President when he visited the church recently, which did not go over well with some in the congregation.

Administration reduces fetal tissue research

The issue of research using embryos actually became a defining moment in the Presidency of George W. Bush, as he announced a limited ban on the practice of using embryos for the purpose of research, which takes a human life.  Now, in the Trump Administration, the Department of Health and Human Services has made an important announcement on the subject.

According to the Liberty Counsel website on Wednesday, June 5:

President Donald Trump’s administration announced today that it will no longer allow federal funding for medical research conducted within the National Institutes of Health (NIH) which involves the use of human fetal tissue of aborted babies. The NIH is an organization within the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). The NIH estimates it spent $103 million taxpayer dollars purchasing and experimenting on human fetal tissue in fiscal year 2018.

Furthermore, $100 million devoted to fetal tissue research has been taken away from the University of California-San Francisco that, as Liberty Counsel puts it, "uses fetal tissue to test new HIV treatments." The site also says that, "Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) said it is conducting a comprehensive review of all research involving fetal tissue."

Washington florist dealt another blow in state Supreme Court

Barronelle Stutzman is a florist in Washington state who, a number of years ago, declined to provide flowers for gay couple to celebrate a same-sex wedding.  The state's Attorney General got involved, saying that Barronelle had discriminated against this couple, and ultimately, the state's Supreme Court ruled against her.

The case ended up back at the Washington Supreme Court because the U.S. Supreme Court instructed the state's high court to reevaluate its decision in light of the Masterpiece Cakeshop case. Alliance Defending Freedom included a piece on its website on these recent developments.  It stated:

Without even holding an oral argument, the state court came back with the same result, repeating verbatim much of what it said in its original decision rather than reconsidering the case as the U.S. Supreme Court directed.

The website's analysis continued:

Washington’s highest court read the Masterpiece Cakeshop decision as narrowly as possible, saying that the U.S. Supreme Court’s condemnation of government hostility toward religion applies only to adjudicatory bodies and no other branch of government. As ADF attorneys explain, other U.S. Supreme Court decisions say the exact opposite. In fact, Stutzman’s argument that the state attorney general showed hostility toward religion is what caused the U.S. Supreme Court to send the case back in the first place.

Stutzman could still face stiff financial penalties, according to ADF.  The organization's John Bursch said, "We look forward to taking Barronelle’s case back to the U.S. Supreme Court.”

Prayer for President causes concern

Last Sunday, June 2, had been designated by over 250 Christian leaders as a special Day of Prayer for President Trump.  The effort was led by Franklin Graham, and one particular Virginia church had the opportunity to pray for the President in person.

That church was McLean Bible Church, and the President came to the church near the conclusion of an early afternoon service.  Pastor David Platt, formerly of Birmingham's Church at Brook Hills and the Southern Baptist International Mission Board, led the congregation in prayer, a prayer that was widely lauded.

According to ToddStarnes.com, not all were pleased with the pastoral prayer.  Starnes reports:

However, some in the congregation were reportedly offended by the notion that a preacher would dare to soil the “sanctity” of the church house by praying for a fellow sinner.

Platt wrote on the church's website, “My aim was in no way to endorse the president, his policies, or his party, but to obey God’s command to pray for our president and other leaders to govern in the way this passage portrays..."  He outlined how the Presidential visit unfolded and the reasoning for his prayer.  Starnes pointed out, "Politico incorrectly reported Pastor Platt apologized for the prayer. They later corrected the story."

Starnes lamented:

It’s unthinkable that any Bible-believing Christian would take offense at someone being prayed for simply because of their politics or their spiritual condition.

He wrote, "You may think that President Trump is the worst sinner in America...Well, that’s all the more reason to pray for the president."

The 3 - June 2, 2019

This week's edition of The 3, with three stories of relevance to the Christian community, highlights three stories relative to the issue of the sanctity of life.  In Missouri, just after the governor bill signed pro-life legislation, a state judge allowed the state's last abortion clinic to stay in business, even though its license was due to expire on Friday.  Also, an Indiana pro-life bill reached the U.S. Supreme Court, which upheld part of it, but did not rule on another, prompting strong words from one particular justice.  And, Louisiana has become the latest state to pass pro-life legislation: a heartbeat bill signed into law by a Democrat governor.

Judge allows last abortion clinic in MO to operate

The state of Missouri has been at the center of the abortion issue recently.  For one thing, the governor of the state signed into a law a bill that bans abortion in the state at the eight-week stage of development.  CBN News reported last week that Republican Governor Mike Parson...

...signed a bill Friday banning abortions on or beyond the eighth week of pregnancy, with no exceptions for rape or incest.

Under the Missouri law that comes into force Aug. 28, doctors who violate the eight-week cutoff could face five to 15 years in prison. Women who terminate their pregnancies cannot be prosecuted.

Planned Parenthood has filed a lawsuit, asking a circuit court judge to grant a restraining order against the state. The court will hear arguments on Wednesday. The organization wants the state to renew its license.

The license for the lone clinic remaining in Missouri was set to expire this past Friday, May 31. USA Today reported that:

St. Louis Circuit Judge Michael Stelzer ruled Friday, just hours before the Planned Parenthood clinic's license to perform abortions was set to expire. He issued a temporary restraining order prohibiting Missouri from allowing the license to lapse.

State officials refused to renew the facility's license, which was set to expire Friday, demanding interviews with staff doctors for an investigation into “a large number of possible deficiencies."

Missouri was on the verge of being the first state in the union since Roe vs. Wade to have zero abortion clinics, according to the article.  Now, a local judge has stepped in and has allowed abortions to continue there.

Supreme Court strikes down part of IN pro-life law, justice takes occasion to decry abortion

The U.S. Supreme Court took mixed action regarding a 2016 law in the state of Indiana, upholding one portion of the legislation, but declining to hear another.  ChristianHeadlines.com reported that:

The U.S. Supreme Court Tuesday ruled that states can require the remains of aborted unborn babies to be buried or cremated, upholding part of a 2016 Indiana law that was signed by then-Gov. Mike Pence.

Meanwhile, the Supreme Court declined to take up a case involving another part of the law banning abortions based on race, sex or disability.

The U.S. Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals had ruled both parts of the law were unconstitutional.

Family Research Council explored some of the comments by Justice Clarence Thomas regarding the high court's refusal to take up the second portion of the law.  It stated:

To Justice Thomas's horror, the court essentially gave its consent to Hoosiers targeting their babies for certain traits or characteristics. "In other contexts," he wrote, "the Court has been zealous in vindicating the rights of people even potentially subjected to race, sex, and disability discrimination." But by refusing to uphold this law, he went on, the court may as well be "constitutionaliz[ing] the views of the 20th-century eugenics movement," which -- Thomas explains -- were the vision of Planned Parenthood's founder, Margaret Sanger.

In the footnotes to the ruling, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg took issue with Thomas and made the ghastly declaration, "A woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a 'mother,'" according to the article. FRC went on to say:

Thomas fired back in his own footnote that Justice Ginsburg "makes little sense."

"It is not a 'waste' of our resources to summarily reverse an incorrect decision that created a Circuit split." It's time, he said to "confront the constitutionality of these laws... [W]e cannot avoid them forever." The court invented a right to abortion, he argued. Now it's "dutybound to address its scope."

Thomas says, "it's time." Alabama lawmakers basically said that recently as well; other states have crafted new pro-life laws, and there is hope that at least one of them will get before the high court. FRC points out that: "There are at least 20 abortion cases in the Supreme Court pipeline..."

Pro-life bill in LA sponsored by Democrat legislator signed by Democrat governor

Meanwhile, another state has passed stronger restrictions on abortion, and a unique feature of this bill is that it was sponsored by a Democrat lawmaker in one chamber of the state's legislature and a Democrat governor promised to sign it.

According to LifeSiteNews.com:

On Wednesday, the Louisiana House voted 79-23 to give final approval to legislation that forbids aborting any baby with a detectable heartbeat, except to “prevent the death of a pregnant woman or to prevent a serious risk of the substantial and irreversible impairment of a major bodily function of the pregnant woman,” or if the baby “has a profound and irremediable congenital or chromosomal anomaly that is incompatible with sustaining life after birth.”

There are no exceptions for rape and incest in this bill.  It has been signed by Governor John Bel Edwards.  The article continues:

...Edwards confirmed he would sign the bill in a statement, declaring he “ran for governor as a pro-life candidate after serving as a pro-life legislator for eight years” and has “been true to my word and my beliefs on this issue.”

He added, "As I prepare to sign this bill, I call on the overwhelming bipartisan majority of legislators who voted for it to join me in continuing to build a better Louisiana that cares for the least among us and provides more opportunity for everyone.”

According to Fox8:

Rep. Valarie Hodges, R-Denham Springs carried Senate Bill 184 in the House, which was written by Sen. John Milkovich, a Democrat from Shreveport.

“I just want to say I’m proud to stand with this legislation and the state of Louisiana. We’re very pro-life,” Hodges said.

Another provision of the bill, according to LifeSiteNews, is that it would not go into effect until Mississippi's heartbeat bill is upheld in Federal court.  That bill faces a hurdle, in that it is being considered by the same Federal judge who has placed the state's 15-week ban on hold.  The Clarion-Ledger reported on May 24:

U.S. District Judge Carlton Reeves on Friday issued a strongly worded preliminary injunction blocking Mississippi's "heartbeat" abortion law, that would have banned abortions as early as six weeks into a pregnancy, when a fetal heartbeat is detected.

Reeves' order will combine the lawsuit against Mississippi's fetal heartbeat ban with an ongoing one against the state's previous 15-week abortion ban.

"Here we go again," Reeves wrote. "Mississippi has passed another law banning abortions prior to viability. The latest interpretation (Mississippi's new law) bans abortions in Mississippi after a fetal heartbeat is detected, which is as early as 6 weeks."