The 3 - October 13, 2024

In the latest edition of The 3, featuring three stories of relevance to the Christian community, there's a story about a ruling by a federal judge in New York upholding the free speech rights of pro-life pregnancy centers to promote abortion pill reversal.  Also, the U.S. Supreme Court has announced it will not hear a challenge to an appeals court ruling involving a Texas case in which the federal government was attempting to force emergency room doctors to perform abortions. And, four schools on the collegiate level have announced their plans not to compete against a ladies' volleyball team that has a male member identifying as female.

Federal judge in New York allows free speech of pro-life pregnancy centers to promote abortion pill reversal

A federal judge in New York has issued another temporary ruling protecting the rights of pro-life pregnancy resource centers to share information about abortion pill reversal, according to Liberty Counsel's website, which outlines that the reversal process can be implemented within 72 hours after the first dose of the abortion pill regimen. 

This ruling follows a similar ruling in another case involving 51 pro-life centers, which has now been consolidated with the case of two more centers.  Liberty Counsel relates:

The preliminary injunction protects Summit Life Outreach Center and The Evergreen Association from the state’s attempts to silence them with threats, intimidation, and prosecution under the state’s false advertising law. New York’s attorney general claims APR is “unproven” and has accused pregnancy centers across the state of fraudulent business practices and false advertising.

Referencing New York Attorney General Letitia James, the website notes: 

However, Summit and Evergreen allege the state’s actions violate the First and Fourteenth Amendments and that James’ illegal targeting of pregnancy centers unconstitutionally censors their speech about the safety and efficacy of abortion pill reversal. In the previous ruling, District Judge John L. Sinatra, Jr. stated that pregnancy centers are “likely to succeed on the merits” with their Free Speech claims since restricting speech about APR “casts a chill” on the First Amendment.

And, CBNNews.com reports on a similar lawsuit out of California, reporting:

The Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF), a non-profit legal group, has filed a lawsuit on behalf of the National Institute of Family and Life Advocates and SCV Pregnancy Center in Santa Clarita, California, against state Attorney General Rob Bonta.

As CBN News reported, Bonta filed a lawsuit last year against Heartbeat International (HBI) and RealOptions, two faith-based pregnancy centers, to stop them from advertising abortion pill reversal services, claiming that the natural hormone used to reverse the abortion pill is "risky" and "has no credible scientific backing."

SCOTUS says "no" to hearing abortion ER case out of Texas

Just months after the U.S. Supreme Court refused to rule on a similar case out of Idaho, it has decided not to hear a case out of Texas, in a ruling that would, according to the Alliance Defending Freedom website, "deny the federal government’s request to hear the case Becerra v. State of Texas, upholding the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit’s ruling, which prevented the federal government from 'illegally using federal law to force emergency room doctors to perform abortions...;"

ADF Senior Counsel Matt Bowman is quoted on the website, stating, "Hospitals—especially emergency rooms—are tasked with preserving life. For this reason, the 5th Circuit correctly ruled that federal bureaucrats have no business compelling doctors or hospitals to end unborn lives...Emergency room physicians can, and do, treat life-threatening conditions such as ectopic pregnancies. And every state allows doctors to do whatever is necessary to preserve the life of a mother. But elective abortion is not life-saving care—it ends the life of the unborn child—and the government has no authority to force doctors to perform these dangerous procedures. We are pleased that the Supreme Court decided the 5th Circuit’s ruling should stand, allowing emergency rooms to fulfill their primary function—saving lives.”

Four collegiate volleyball teams refuse to play team with male member

Last week, I spotlighted the brave stand taken by a school in Vermont, in which it did not allow its girls' basketball team to play in a game in which a male athlete was allowed to participate.  This resulted in a suspension for the school in numerous sports.

There are developments now on a collegiate level, with four teams announcing they would not compete against a team with a male athlete presenting as female.

FoxNews.com recently reported that:

The Utah State Aggies are the latest women’s volleyball team to choose not to participate in a scheduled match against San Jose State University due to a biological male playing on its women’s team.

The university issued a statement saying it would not be participating in its Oct. 23 volleyball match at SJSU.

Utah State joins Southern Utah, Boise State and the University of Wyoming in refusing to compete against SJSU.

The Fox piece, as well as a Christian Post story noted that a teammate of the male player, Blaire Fleming, is part of a lawsuit against the NCAA.  The Post article related:

One of Fleming’s SJSU teammates, Brooke Slusser, is a plaintiff in a class action lawsuit filed against the National Collegiate Athletic Association over alleged violations of Title IX.

Filed in March by the group Independent Council on Women’s Sports, the lawsuit alleges that the NCAA has violated Title IX by allowing men to compete in women’s sports.

Slusser told OutKick that she joined the lawsuit because “it's something I truly believe in” and that this was “something that so many people do care about,” saying that having Fleming on her team was “a really hard pill to swallow.”

"I couldn't comprehend the fact that there was a man on the team, and it was almost as if I was in denial for a really long time that this was happening," Slusser said. "So it was just really hard for me to wrap my head around.”

Writing for FoxNews.com, Macy Petty, a legislative strategist for Concerned Women for America and former NCAA volleyball player, stated:

Without any underlying research to justify it, the NCAA has compromised women’s sports to the detriment of female athletes around the world. Despite an outcry of public opposition, the NCAA has continued to invite men into women’s private spaces and competition. 

Petty laments the lack of prior notice about men identifying as women playing on female sports teams; that previous Fox piece stated that Petty...

...spoke with Fox News Digital’s Sarah Rumpf-Whitten about how players are feeling "blindsided" because the NCAA has not informed teams of the presence of transgender players on opposing squads.

"There's no informed consent for the schools or for the female athletes here. They're totally blindsided when they walk up to the court, and they see that there's a male athlete on the other side," Petty said.

In her Fox op-ed, Petty writes: 

Women’s voices in college sports matter. We fought hard for – and deserve – the right to say no when we do not consent to playing alongside men. It’s time to hold the NCAA responsible for this reckless disregard for women’s safety and fair play in college sports.